Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754907AbaBDRLJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2014 12:11:09 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:46037 "EHLO mail-ob0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752735AbaBDRLG (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2014 12:11:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1391446195-9457-1-git-send-email-kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 12:10:45 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: __set_page_dirty_nobuffers uses spin_lock_irqseve instead of spin_lock_irq To: David Rientjes Cc: LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , Larry Woodman , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , stable@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Indeed, good catch. Do we need the same treatment for > __set_page_dirty_buffers() that can be called by way of > clear_page_dirty_for_io()? Indeed. I posted a patch fixed __set_page_dirty() too. plz see Subject: [PATCH] __set_page_dirty uses spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock_irq -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/