Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934155AbaBDVQu (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:16:50 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com ([209.85.213.182]:58050 "EHLO mail-ig0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932984AbaBDVQo (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:16:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:16:38 -0500 From: Matt Porter To: Mark Brown Cc: Wolfram Sang , Tim Kryger , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Samuel Ortiz , Lee Jones , Liam Girdwood , Christian Daudt , Devicetree List , Linux I2C List , Linux ARM Kernel List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] regulator: add bcm59056 pmu DT binding Message-ID: <20140204211638.GA16179@beef> References: <1391516352-32359-1-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org> <1391516352-32359-3-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org> <20140204172309.GG22609@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140204172309.GG22609@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 05:23:09PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 07:19:08AM -0500, Matt Porter wrote: > > Add a DT binding for the BCM59056 PMU. The binding inherits from > > the generic regulator bindings. > > Is this really only a regulator - does the chip have no other functions? It's your average multi-function device with other functions as you are suspecting. Buried in the the MFD driver comments is me admitting that I need to split this into two bindings. The base device, "bcm59056" and then "bcm59056-reg". So point noted, I'll updated with the appropriate binding for each. > > +- regulators: This is the list of child nodes that specify the regulator > > + initialization data for defined regulators. Generic regulator bindings > > + are described in regulator/regulator.txt. > > The regulators property should always be optional, the driver should be > able to start up and read back the hardware state without any further > configuration. Ahh, ok. I will make it so. Thanks, Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/