Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:29:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:29:54 -0500 Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org ([64.81.58.33]:2968 "EHLO ishtar.tlinx.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:29:53 -0500 From: "LA Walsh" To: "'Alexander Viro'" , "'Dax Kelson'" Cc: "'Chris Wedgwood'" , "'Rik van Riel'" , "'Linus Torvalds'" , "'Rusty Russell'" , Subject: RE: What's left over. Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:35:17 -0800 Message-ID: <000001c28296$35f8d380$1403a8c0@sc.tlinx.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 739 Lines: 20 Then why do we need 'non-repudiation' w/r/t certificates? Isn't the idea to provide a way to isolate "bugs" in the "security" system. If something is written to a file by the group signon, who wrote it? > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of > Alexander Viro > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:43 PM > Then give them all the same account and be done with that. > Effect will > be the same. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/