Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935823AbaBDWWg (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:22:36 -0500 Received: from smtpfb2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.10]:36739 "EHLO smtpfb2-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933903AbaBDWWc (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:22:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 23:22:05 +0100 From: Guillaume Morin To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, john.stultz@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/37] 3.4.79-stable review Message-ID: <20140204222203.GA6688@bender.morinfr.org> Mail-Followup-To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, john.stultz@linaro.org References: <20140204210055.992134150@linuxfoundation.org> <20140204215221.GA2127@bender.morinfr.org> <20140204221109.GA906@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140204221109.GA906@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04 Feb 14:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Borislav Petkov > > > rtc-cmos: Add an alarm disable quirk > > > > This is just one of the 3 patches posted by John Stultz on > > http://git.linaro.org/people/john.stultz/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/stable/3.4/timefix > > I have no idea what that tree is, nor what I am supposed to do with it. Ok, sorry. This is all coming from http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/77575/ I assumed you were aware of it because you participated in the thread and one of the patch mentioned in this message (Borislav's change) is applied to the 3.4 branch > > The other 2 are backports of 6fdda9a9c5db367130cf32df5d6618d08b89f46a > > (timekeeping: Avoid possible deadlock from clock_was_set_delayed) and > > ec145babe754f9ea1079034a108104b6001e001c (timekeeping: fix 32-bit > > overflow in get_monotonic_boottime) > > > > Could you explain why there were not included? > > Can you explain why I would include them? :) they seem to fix important issues and you seemed to be ok with including them in stable trees at some point: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/77261/ Note that I am not pushing for anything. I was just under the (incorrect) impression that you would apply them to the 3.4 branch and was surprised when it did not happen I hope the situation is a bit clearer. Guillaume. -- Guillaume Morin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/