Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752140AbaBELPQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 06:15:16 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:49543 "EHLO mail-wi0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751509AbaBELPO (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 06:15:14 -0500 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/14] of: mtd: add documentation for nand-ecc-level property To: Ezequiel Garcia , Boris BREZILLON Cc: Maxime Ripard , Rob Landley , Russell King , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Jason Gunthorpe , Arnd Bergmann , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, dev@linux-sunxi.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Pekon Gupta In-Reply-To: <20140129175331.GA27143@localhost> References: <1391006064-28890-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com> < 1391006064-28890-4-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com> < 20140129175331.GA27143@localhost> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:15:00 +0000 Message-Id: <20140205111500.B19FDC40A89@trevor.secretlab.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:53:32 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:34:13PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > > nand-ecc-level property statically defines NAND chip's ECC requirements. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt > > index 03855c8..0c962296 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt > > @@ -3,5 +3,8 @@ > > - nand-ecc-mode : String, operation mode of the NAND ecc mode. > > Supported values are: "none", "soft", "hw", "hw_syndrome", "hw_oob_first", > > "soft_bch". > > +- nand-ecc-level : Two cells property defining the ECC level requirements. > > + The first cell represent the strength and the second cell the ECC block size. > > + E.g. : nand-ecc-level = <4 512>; /* 4 bits / 512 bytes */ > > - nand-bus-width : 8 or 16 bus width if not present 8 > > - nand-on-flash-bbt: boolean to enable on flash bbt option if not present false > > Hm.. when was this proposal agreed? It seems I've missed the > discussion... > > FWIW, we've already proposed an equivalent one, but it received no > feedback from the devicetree maintainers: Sorry, binding review has become a huge undertaking. > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58764 > > Maybe we can discuss about it now? > > nand-ecc-strength : integer ECC required strength. > nand-ecc-size : integer step size associated to the ECC strength. I'm okay with either, but the above binding is indeed more readable. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/