Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752217AbaBEMGH (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:07 -0500 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:59970 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750723AbaBEMGF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:05 -0500 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Grant Likely Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , arm@kernel.org, Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Zabel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:05:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1816961.2dvm7Iumeh@phil> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.3 (Linux/3.11-2-amd64; KDE/4.11.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20140205111247.476B7C40A89@trevor.secretlab.ca> References: <4970034.fqvMoHdOyd@phil> <1782709.QdZpsrsctf@phil> <20140205111247.476B7C40A89@trevor.secretlab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2014, 11:12:47 schrieb Grant Likely: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:42:58 +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Some SoCs need parts of their sram for special purposes. So while being > > part of the peripheral, it should not be part of the genpool controlling > > the sram. > > > > Therefore add an option mmio-sram-reserved to keep arbitrary portions of > > the sram from general usage. > > > > Suggested-by: Rob Herring > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > > Tested-by: Ulrich Prinz > > Acked-by: Rob Herring > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt index 4d0a00e..09ee7a3 > > 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt > > > > @@ -8,9 +8,17 @@ Required properties: > > - reg : SRAM iomem address range > > > > +Optional properties: > > + > > +- mmio-sram-reserved: ordered list of reserved chunks inside the sram > > that > > + should not be used by the operating system. > > + Format is , , ...; with base being relative to > > the > > + reg property base. > > + > > We've now got a draft binding for reserved memory. Can you use the format > here? Basically each reserved region is a sub node with either a reg > property or a size property. > > This is specifically for sram, so I won't make a big deal about it, but > it would be good to have some commonality. I guess you're talking about "[PATCH v2 0/5] reserved-memory regions/CMA in devicetree, again", right? In general I'm all for commonality :-). So I guess you mean it to look something like the following: sram: sram@10080000 { compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-sram", "mmio-sram"; reg = <0x10080000 0x8000>; reserved-memory { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; smp@200 { /* hmm, relative or absolute, aka 0x200 or 0x10080200? */ reg = <0x200 0x50>; }; }; }; As it looks like only a slight modification of my "parsing" code this should be doable. Do you suggest more changes to the example above? Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/