Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 14:04:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 14:04:53 -0500 Received: from amsfep11-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.20]:2861 "EHLO amsfep11-int.chello.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 14:04:52 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Jos Hulzink To: Dave Jones Subject: Re: 2.5.45 build failed with ACPI turned on Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 21:11:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: "Grover, Andrew" , Robert Varga , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200211012221.56346.josh@stack.nl> <20021101203121.GB2329@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20021101203121.GB2329@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200211022111.25198.josh@stack.nl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1058 Lines: 21 On Friday 01 November 2002 21:31, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:21:56PM +0100, Jos Hulzink wrote: > > Other issue: Are ACPI and APM not mutually exclusive ? If so, I would > > propose a selection box: with related options shown > > below. Hmzz.. there the issue of the fact that ACPI is more than power > > management shows up again. > > Whilst they can't both run at the same time, it's perfectly possible > (and useful) to build a kernel with both included. ACPI will quit > if APM is already running, so booting with apm=off turns the same > kernel into 'ACPI mode' Hmzz.. in that case I vote for dropping CONFIG_PM in favour of CONFIG_APM || CONFIG_ACPI, even though it requires some more typing for the programmers. (I'm no ACPI programmer, so I don't care ;-) Jos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/