Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:34:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:34:15 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:3970 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:34:13 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 22:40:14 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: "Adam J. Richter" Cc: thornber@sistina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch(2.5.45): move io_restrictions to blkdev.h Message-ID: <20021102214014.GF3612@suse.de> References: <20021102105119.A6865@adam.yggdrasil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021102105119.A6865@adam.yggdrasil.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 811 Lines: 24 On Sat, Nov 02 2002, Adam J. Richter wrote: > This patch makes good on a threat that I posted yesterday > to move struct io_restrictions from to > , eliminating duplication of a list of fields in > struct request_queue. Adam, I generally think the patch is a good idea. I also think it's a very stupid time to start messing with stuff that is basically trivial but still touches lost of stuff. Please leave it alone for a few weeks. > Jens, can I persuade you to integrate this change? In due time, yes. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/