Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261447AbSKBV6C>; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:58:02 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261448AbSKBV6C>; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:58:02 -0500
Received: from im1.mail.tds.net ([216.170.230.91]:56753 "EHLO im1.sec.tds.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S261447AbSKBV6B>;
	Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:58:01 -0500
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:00:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Jon Portnoy <portnoy@tellink.net>
X-X-Sender: portnoy@cerberus.localhost
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd@treblig.org>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)
In-Reply-To: <20021102203608.GB731@gallifrey>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211021159500.14143-100000@cerberus.localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 878
Lines: 30



On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:

> * Nero (neroz@iinet.net.au) wrote:
> > Romain Lievin wrote:
> > 
[snip]
> > 
> > Yes please :)
> > GTK+ is probably the most common (decent) toolkit out there - nearly any 
> > system with X has it installed, from what I've seen.
> 
> Oh please....
> Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the
> qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like
> the library?
> 
> Dave

Why? I have a couple boxes that have GTK and don't have QT. A GTK-based 
configuration system would be most useful.

Diversity and choice are good things.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/