Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:28:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:28:51 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:45707 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:28:50 -0500 Subject: Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) From: Alan Cox To: Patrick Finnegan Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 02 Nov 2002 22:56:19 +0000 Message-Id: <1036277779.16971.76.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 932 Lines: 24 On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 21:57, Patrick Finnegan wrote: > On 2 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 20:36, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > Oh please.... > > > Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the > > > qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like > > > the library? > > > > Lota of installations have gtk but don't have qt. > > And a lot of installations have QT but not GTK... This feels like a vi vs > emacs discussion. It sort of is. The difference being its "do I send you a vi macro or an emacs macro", and the obvious answer in this case being that if someone wants go write both then we all win. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/