Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:53:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:53:56 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.139]:21256 "EHLO smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:53:55 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 00:59:49 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Nero cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Subject: Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) In-Reply-To: <200211030943.13730.neroz@iinet.net.au> Message-ID: References: <1036274342.16803.27.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20021102232836.GD731@gallifrey> <200211030943.13730.neroz@iinet.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 888 Lines: 21 Hi, On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Nero wrote: > OR, we could use the logical choice. GTK+ is on most systems, has hardly any > dependancies, is relatively small (compared to Qt) and doesn't require a C++ > compiler. Really, I think the only people being religious here are the ones > voting for Qt, as it just doesn't make sense to use it for such a thing. Show me the source and we can continue this discussion. Right now qconf is included as replacement for the old xconfig. It shouldn't take to much effort to package it seperately. As soon as someone is interested in doing this for a distribtion I'll add the few missing bits. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/