Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751800AbaBGFLi (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 00:11:38 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0091.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.91]:33547 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750787AbaBGFLg (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 00:11:36 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:960:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2198:2199:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3874:4321:5007:7652:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13071:13311:13357:21060,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: elbow88_81f9690c7fe05 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1751 Message-ID: <1391749891.15777.31.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] Add support for MSM's mmio clock/reset controller From: Joe Perches To: frowand.list@gmail.com Cc: Stephen Boyd , Mike Turquette , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Saravana Kannan Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:11:31 -0800 In-Reply-To: <52F45DEE.8020400@gmail.com> References: <1389811654-21397-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <52F45DEE.8020400@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 20:15 -0800, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 1/15/2014 10:47 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > The first breaks a reset-controller include ordering requirement. It got > > an ack so I think we're ok for it to go through the clock tree. > > > > < snip > > > checkpatch is whining about patches > > 4 > 5 > 6 > 7 > 8 > > (Just for completeness if someone thinks I did not check all the patches, > it also whines about patch 11, but I think the whining should be ignored, > and it whines about patch 1 but I think that might be a checkpatch bug.) Hi Frank. For patch 1, what checkpatch bug might that be? I think all the checkpatch whinges in patch 11 are correct. I didn't check any of 4-8. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/