Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 22:51:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 22:51:54 -0500 Received: from out002pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.141]:2793 "EHLO out002.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 22:51:53 -0500 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 21:57:49 -0500 From: Akira Tsukamoto To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2/2 2.5.45 cleanup & add original copy_ro/from_user Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hirokazu Takahashi In-Reply-To: <3DC3A9C0.7979C276@digeo.com> References: <20021102025838.220E.AT541@columbia.edu> <3DC3A9C0.7979C276@digeo.com> Message-Id: <20021102214537.379A.AT541@columbia.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05.06 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at out002.verizon.net from [138.89.32.225] at Sat, 2 Nov 2002 21:58:17 -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 700 Lines: 16 On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 02:32:32 -0800 Andrew Morton mentioned: > I'd prefer that we have these functions in .c, and laid out with > a minimum of C tricks. Because more work needs to be done on the > memory copy functions, and doing that in header files is a pain. Personally I don't mind adding everything in .h or .c. I just used the convention what string.h and string-486.h doing. Isn't it confusing that adding everything in .c also? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/