Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 23:02:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 23:02:06 -0500 Received: from cambot.suite224.net ([209.176.64.2]:7955 "EHLO suite224.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 23:02:05 -0500 Message-ID: <001d01c282ef$578abd20$f642b0d1@pcs686> From: "Matthew D. Pitts" To: References: <1036277779.16971.76.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 23:07:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1070 Lines: 32 > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 21:57, Patrick Finnegan wrote: > > On 2 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 20:36, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > > Oh please.... > > > > Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the > > > > qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like > > > > the library? > > > > > > Lota of installations have gtk but don't have qt. > > > > And a lot of installations have QT but not GTK... This feels like a vi vs > > emacs discussion. > > It sort of is. The difference being its "do I send you a vi macro or an > emacs macro", and the obvious answer in this case being that if someone > wants go write both then we all win. I agree, Alan. And I would like to ask that someone improve the library search logic... Matthew D. Pitts - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/