Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 08:17:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 08:17:01 -0500 Received: from blackbird.intercode.com.au ([203.32.101.10]:51470 "EHLO blackbird.intercode.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 08:17:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 00:22:39 +1100 (EST) From: James Morris To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= cc: kisza@securityaudit.hu, , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up In-Reply-To: <20021103.221658.52523847.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 576 Lines: 21 On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote: > So, the reason why the copy of route6_me_harder() > lives there is because net/ipv6/ip6_output.c has not been > exported it. > Yes. It would be much better to use common core networking code. - James -- James Morris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/