Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751581AbaBIHV2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Feb 2014 02:21:28 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:61241 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751379AbaBIHV1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Feb 2014 02:21:27 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,811,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="452171160" Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 23:21:23 -0800 From: Andi Kleen To: stefani@seibold.net Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, aarcange@redhat.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, luto@amacapital.net, xemul@parallels.com, gorcunov@openvz.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, Martin.Runge@rohde-schwarz.com, Andreas.Brief@rohde-schwarz.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 8/9] Add 32 bit VDSO time support for 32 bit kernel Message-ID: <20140209072123.GA23964@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1391894951-6381-1-git-send-email-stefani@seibold.net> <1391894951-6381-9-git-send-email-stefani@seibold.net> <20140209052230.GL12219@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140209052230.GL12219@tassilo.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 09:22:30PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > +notrace static long vdso_fallback_gettime(long clock, struct timespec *ts) > > +{ > > + long ret; > > + > > + asm( > > + "push %%ebx \n" > > + "mov %2,%%ebx \n" > > + "call VDSO32_vsyscall \n" > > + "pop %%ebx \n" > > + : "=a" (ret) > > + : "0" (__NR_clock_gettime), "d" (clock), "c" (ts) > > + : "memory"); > > The push/mov/pop could be just replaced with "b"? Actually thinking about it more you likely did that to avoid errors with -fPIC right? In this case you still need to supply correct dwarf2 unwind annotations. Also this change is still needed: > Also I if this calls syscall.S:__kernel_vsyscall it clobbers more registers > (ecx at least?) and you need to describe that to gcc with a + > > Same in the other sys calls. > > > @@ -310,6 +311,11 @@ int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm, int uses_interp) > > unsigned long addr; > > int ret = 0; > > bool compat; > > + struct vm_area_struct *vma; > > + extern char __vvar_page; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HPET_TIMER > > + extern unsigned long hpet_address; > > +#endif > > Put this into a header. > > > +++ b/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ > > +#define BUILD_VDSO32 > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > > + > > +#define _ASM_X86_PAGE_H > > + > > +#define __pa(x) 0 > > +#define __va(x) 0 > > + > > +#undef CONFIG_ILLEGAL_POINTER_VALUE > > +#define CONFIG_ILLEGAL_POINTER_VALUE 0 > > This needs some comments. > > Why are the __pa/__va defines safe? > > The rest of the patchkit looks reasonable to me from a quick read. > Much better than the first version. > > -Andi > > -- > ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/