Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 01:32:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 01:32:07 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:43158 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 01:31:59 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:31:45 -0700 Message-Id: <200102050631.f156Vje04234@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper) Cc: Pierre Rousselet , David Ford , devfs@oss.sgi.com, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] devfsd, compiling on glibc22x In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <3A7383B2.19DDD006@linux.com> <3A73C1D8.578AEEE@wanadoo.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ulrich Drepper writes: > Pierre Rousselet writes: > > > for me : > > make CFLAGS='-O2 -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE' > > compiles without any patch. is it correct ? > > Yes. RTLD_NEXT is not in any standard, it's an extension available > via -D_GNU_SOURCE. So why do old binaries (compiled with glibc 2.1.3) segfault when they call dlsym() with RTLD_NEXT? Even newly compiled binaries (with glibc 2.2) still segfault. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/