Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752720AbaBJLKE (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:10:04 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:39417 "EHLO mail-pd0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751869AbaBJLJ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:09:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140210110723.GV25314@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1383828154-428-1-git-send-email-ch.naveen@samsung.com> <20140210103354.GT25314@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20140210110723.GV25314@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> From: Naveen Krishna Ch Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:39:39 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: handle gate clock for misplaced TRIMINFO register To: Mark Rutland Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "rui.zhang@intel.com" , "eduardo.valentin@ti.com" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "amit.daniel@samsung.com" , "kgene.kim@samsung.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "b.zolnierkie@samsung.com" , "cpgs@samsung.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Mark, On 10 February 2014 16:37, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:50:01AM +0000, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote: >> Hello Mark, >> >> On 10 February 2014 16:03, Mark Rutland wrote: >> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:42:34PM +0000, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: >> >> On Exynos5420 the TMU(4) for GPU has a seperate clock enable bit from >> >> the other TMU channels(0 ~ 3). Hence, accessing TRIMINFO for base_second >> >> should be acompanied by enabling the respective clock. >> >> >> >> This patch which allow for a "clk_sec" clock to be specified in the >> >> device-tree which will be ungated when accessing the TRIMINFO register. >> > >> > Missing binding document update? Or was "clk_sec" originally in the >> > binding but unused? >> > >> > The code seems to expect "tmu_apbif_sec" as the clock name in the DT, >> > but this isn't mentioned in the commit message. >> > >> > I grepped Documentation/devicetree in mainline, but found no reference >> > of either. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Mark. >> This CL is to be abandoned. > > Ok. > >> >> As mentioned in the previous replies to this patch. >> The changes in this patched were merged with >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html >> >> The latest patch set can be found at. >> 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15163.html >> 2. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15164.html >> 3. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html >> 4. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html > > I responded here because of your ping message on 2014-02-07. The latest > patches seem to have been posted before that. Was the ping misplaced or > have I misunderstood? It was my bad, I replied to the patches in that series and i myself forgot that it was abandoned patch. Sorry. > > Thanks, > Mark -- Shine bright, (: Nav :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/