Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752726AbaBJQxs (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:53:48 -0500 Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:64679 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751889AbaBJQxq (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:53:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20140210105346.14592yef0najhyio@67.228.131.205> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:53:46 -0600 From: linux@roeck-us.net To: Jean Delvare Cc: Lee Jones , Laszlo Papp , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix References: <1392045953-26596-1-git-send-email-lpapp@kde.org> <20140210160842.GB26997@lee--X1> <20140210173811.04ba5964@endymion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20140210173811.04ba5964@endymion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.10) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Jean Delvare : > > That being said, going with MFD in this case seems quite overkill to > me. MFD makes a lot of sense when each function has its own resources. > As this isn't the case here, a single driver registering both an hwmon > interface and a pinctrl interface would seem sufficient to me. But I > think Guenter already discussed this in the past so I'll let him > continue and decide. > That is what I had suggested as well (though we were talking gpio at the time). Laszlo didn't want to do it this way for some reason. Right now I don't really have an idea what to do. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/