Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 15:22:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 15:22:02 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.139]:9481 "EHLO smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 15:20:58 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:27:25 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Petr Baudis cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: [kconfig] Survival of scripts/Menuconfig? In-Reply-To: <20021103194647.GD2516@pasky.ji.cz> Message-ID: References: <20021103111333.GA2516@pasky.ji.cz> <20021103194647.GD2516@pasky.ji.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 826 Lines: 20 Hi, On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Petr Baudis wrote: > Well, I think that it's not so good idea to have menuconfig distributed > separately, since it is probably the best thing you can get out of the text > mode, and there're really not much alternatives you could dream out. Having the > make config as the only way to configure the kernel is not a good thing, IMHO. We already have a working menuconfig, which is distributed with the kernel. Integrating mconf.c and lxdialog is a good idea though, as it would give us the chance to fix some problems in the user interface. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/