Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 04:26:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 04:26:47 -0500 Received: from fungus.teststation.com ([212.32.186.211]:57337 "EHLO fungus.svenskatest.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 04:26:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:26:28 +0100 (CET) From: Urban Widmark To: Manfred Spraul cc: Thomas Stewart , Jonathan Morton , Subject: Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report) In-Reply-To: <3A7E6670.4AD21D20@colorfullife.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote: > 6 ms is quite long: > I added a reset into tx_timeout, and that function should not take more > than 1 ms or so. > Did you find something about the delay in the documentation? Is it > possible to poll for reset completion? I don't know how long. For testing I figured it might be nice with a long delay, and I was hoping 6ms is long enough. If it changes anything, then you can start working on getting it right. :) There is a flag that may indicate reset complete (that's why the while loop is there). It is supposed to do that for normal "CmdReset" so maybe it does the same for "forced reset". I have no idea if it does. But the reset doesn't seem to change much anyway. The MII PHY (miffy?) is not responding but there are a few registers to play with there. One clear difference is the PHY address, 8 vs 31 (and 31 has some special meaning for some other register). The new register dumps needs to be examined for any vt6102 specifics that are disabled. /Urban - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/