Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751767AbaBKIwp (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:52:45 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.219.54]:65230 "EHLO mail-oa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbaBKIwn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:52:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140128132306.GB9172@localhost.localdomain> References: <20140115171704.GB21574@localhost.localdomain> <20140120155145.GB9436@localhost.localdomain> <20140123145842.GD13345@localhost.localdomain> <20140128132306.GB9172@localhost.localdomain> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:22:43 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [QUERY]: Is using CPU hotplug right for isolating CPUs? From: Viresh Kumar To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lists linaro-kernel , Steven Rostedt , Linaro Networking , Kevin Hilman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28 January 2014 18:53, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > No, when a single task is running on a full dynticks CPU, the tick is supposed to run > every seconds. I'm actually suprised it doesn't happen in your traces, did you tweak > something specific? Why do we need this 1 second tick currently? And what will happen if I hotunplug that CPU and get it back? Would the timer for tick move away from CPU in question? I see that when I have changed this 1sec stuff to 300 seconds. But what would be impact of that? Will things still work normally? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/