MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOMwXhOaJoYgrtBuXgZO3PGym+-ndNrrN2NGTX90vWZWTuG=Kg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1391859219-3102-1-git-send-email-lpapp@kde.org>
	<CAK9yfHx2W3KXzBJavpDwXqBUxM8Uw6tWLRGBLjUq1jS_yWYw-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOMwXhNmjehcd+aiWGuKs7CijheXXngsXTHMfG9SDLpHO=KaPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK9yfHwxmtEXQwPZJfU980G6g7sbrLDU=nZiN=dkwVwvg7UXyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOMwXhNcYpBvMEhcxtvsnByeB7QxO56gjAC+JP2s0tRvmyQiXQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK9yfHxUf_nyd0aYyMGHS5tCEKo-GrLxGNu_18dSL12cPe+J6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOMwXhOaJoYgrtBuXgZO3PGym+-ndNrrN2NGTX90vWZWTuG=Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:44 +0530
Message-ID: <CAK9yfHxzLbENXz60oFTHfp6NmhyyjPavKstrBbrGw_KwjKFYkA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: MAX6650/6651 support
From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
To: Laszlo Papp <lpapp@kde.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 11 February 2014 17:09, Laszlo Papp <lpapp@kde.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 11 February 2014 15:40, Laszlo Papp <lpapp@kde.org> wrote:
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +struct max665x_dev {
>>>>>>> +       struct device *dev;
>>>>>>> +       struct mutex iolock;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +       struct i2c_client *i2c;
>>>>>>> +       struct regmap     *map;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +       int type;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unnecessary extra lines above could be removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> I prefer it that way, but I will remove the two extra lines as you wish.
>>>>
>>>> As I already said, these are just nits and only since you were
>>>> re-spinning the patch,
>>>> I suggested them. Also, since this is a new file being added, it
>>>> avoids further patches
>>>> doing these same things.
>>>
>>> Well, it is worse in my opinion because it makes the code more bloated
>>> without separation between units, but I made the requested change
>>> anyway because the feature matters lotta more to me than this styling.
>>> Hope it is OK now?
>>
>> The only thing that you missed among what you agreed to change is the
>> arrangement of
>> "depends on" and "select" in Kconfig. Rest look OK. Thanks for taking care.
>
> Ah, true. I will do that tomorrow if it is a blocker for the integration.

I don't think it is a blocker in any way and you may choose to ignore
it as well.

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/