Message-ID: <1392140185.28501.29.camel@sagar-desktop>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 11/11] drm/i915: Calling rotate and
 inverse rotate transformations after clipping
From: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
To: Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:06:25 +0530
In-Reply-To: <20140211145615.GT3891@intel.com>
References: <1392017478-4945-1-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
	 <1392017478-4945-12-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
	 <20140210133257.GK3891@intel.com> <1392118351.28501.21.camel@sagar-desktop>
	 <20140211145615.GT3891@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 16:56 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:02:31PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:32 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:01:18PM +0530, sagar.a.kamble@intel.com wrote:
> > > > From: Sagar Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > With clipped sprites these transformations are not working. these
> > > > functions transform complete sprite irrespective of clipping present.
> > > > This leads to invisible portion of sprite show up when rotate 180 if
> > > > it was out of visible area before.
> > > > 
> > > > v4: Moved rotate transform for source rectangle after clipping.
> > > > Added rotate and inverse rotate transform for destination rect.
> > > 
> > > Still NAK.
> > > 
> > > I just pushed rotation support to my glplane test app [1], and with
> > > with that my rotated clipping code works exactly as intended.
> > > 
> > > [1] git://gitorious.org/vsyrjala/glplane.git
> > I tried this app. I think I am considering 180 degree rotation of
> > clipped sprite plane differently. I have captured output with these
> > rotate transforms moved before(clip-rotated) and after(rotate-clipped)
> > clipping code.
> > 
> > Which is valid? Rotating entire sprite and then clipping or Rotating
> > clipped portion?
> > 
> > Reference and Rotated output is attached FYI.
> > 
> > If rotating entire sprite is correct then this patch 11/11 is not needed
> > and can be abandoned.
> 
> The way I think of these things is roughly this:
> 
> You have the user specified source rectangle, where the coordinates specify
> the viewport into the framebuffer. This coordinate space is oriented the
> same was as the framebuffer itself, ie. the first pixel of the
> framebuffer is at coordinates 0,0. So plane rotation doesn't affect this
> at all.
> 
> Then you have the user specified destination/crtc rectangle, where the
> coordinates specify the position of the plane within the crtc coordinate
> space. So the first visible pixel the pipe will push out is at
> coordinates 0,0. So again plane rotation doesn't affect this.
> 
> Then you have the rotation which simply specifies the transformation to
> be applied to the pixels when they "move" from the source rectangle to
> the destination rectangle. So w/ 0 degree rotation the pixel at
> src_x,src_y in the framebuffer will appear at position crtc_x,crtc_y
> on the crtc output. With 180 degree rotation the pixel at src_x,src_y
> will appear at crtc_x+crtc_w-1,crtc_y+crtc_h-1.
> 
> As clipping happens in the crtc coordinate space, we need to orient
> the source coordindates the same way to get the correct clipping result.
> So for example with 0 degrees rotation clipping the left side of the
> destination rectangle must result in clipping the left side of the source
> rectangle as well. And with 180 degree rotation clipping the destination
> rectangle on the left side must result in clipping the source rectangle
> on the right side. Left and right in each case referring to the original
> unrotate coordinates.
> 
> So let's say we have the following situation w/ 180 degree rotation.
> The letters inside the rects represented specific named pixels,
> the FB rectangle represents the FB as specified by addfb2 ioctl,
> the CRTC rectangle represents the pipe output (0,0 -> PIPESRC.w,h):
> 
> FB:                 CRTC:
> 0,0 ___________     0.0 __________
>     |  abcd   |         |         |
>     |  efgh   |         |         |
>     |_________|         |hgfe     |
>                         |dcba_____|
> unclipped coordinates specified by user:
> src_x=2,src_y=0     crtc_x=0,crtc_y=2
> src_w=4.src_h=2     crtc_w=4,crtc_h=2
> 
> clipped coordinates:
> src_x=2,src_y=0     crtc_x=0,crtc_y=2
> src_w=4.src_h=2     crtc_w=4,crtc_h=2
> 
> 
> Then the user moves the sprite one pixel to the left resulting on some
> clipping (the X pixels). Note that the unclipped source coordinates do
> not change here at all, in fact crtc_x is the only thing changed by the
> user:
> 
> FB:                 CRTC:
> 0,0 ___________     0.0 __________
>     |  abcX   |         |         |
>     |  efgX   |         |         |
>     |_________|         Xgfe      |
>                         Xcba______|
> unclipped coordinates specified by user:
> src_x=2,src_y=0     crtc_x=-1,crtc_y=2
> src_w=4.src_h=2     crtc_w= 4,crtc_h=2
> 
> clipped coordinates:
> src_x=2,src_y=0     crtc_x=0,crtc_y=2
> src_w=3.src_h=2     crtc_w=3,crtc_h=2
> 


Understood this now. Thank you Ville for providing this elaborate
graphical view of the rotation cases.

-Sagar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/