Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752063AbaBKS3v (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:29:51 -0500 Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182]:40850 "EHLO mail-qc0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751291AbaBKS3s (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:29:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <52F80C28.5040709@gmail.com> References: <20140120193510.GC5545@xanatos> <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D0F6B8058@AcuExch.aculab.com> <52F80C28.5040709@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:29:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BUGREPORT] Linux USB 3.0 From: Markus Rechberger To: Robert Hancock Cc: David Laight , Sarah Sharp , LKML , USB list , Alan Stern , Greg KH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: > On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight >> wrote: >>> >>> From: Markus Rechberger >>>>>> >>>>>> Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: >>>>>> ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA >>>> >>>> ptr >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> These messages might be harmless. The 3.0 kernel contains a fix for >>>>> Intel Panther Point xHCI hosts that suppresses those messages, commit >>>>> ad808333d8201d53075a11bc8dd83b81f3d68f0b "Intel xhci: Ignore spurious >>>>> successful event." >>>>> >>>>> A later commit extends that to all xHCI 1.0 hosts, commit >>>>> 07f3cb7c28bf3f4dd80bfb136cf45810c46ac474 "usb: host: xhci: Enable >>>>> XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS for all controllers with xhci 1.0" That was >>>>> queued for 3.11 and marked to be backported into stable kernels as old >>>>> as 3.0. >>> >>> >>> I see the same error message on the 0.96 ASMedia controller when >>> the rx buffers for the ax88179_178a driver cross 64k boundaries. >>> >>> So this isn't confined to 1.0 controllers. >>> >> >> Sarah, >> >> since there is no response yet, is there anyone at Intel dedicated at >> working on USB 3.0? >> We are also getting more and more negative USB 3.0 feedback with Linux > > > Still nobody appears to have provided the requested debugging information > that was requested. So there is not much that can be done upstream to debug > things based only on vague reports, especially when not using current kernel > versions. > Next kernel crash report, this time a Synology NAS System: http://support.sundtek.com/index.php/topic,1511.0.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/