Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755197AbaBKTbQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:31:16 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:63597 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754706AbaBKTbI (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:31:08 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Pawel Moll , arm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot , Lee Jones , Mike Turquette , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Walleij , Daniel Lezcano , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Guenter Roeck , Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse , Jean Delvare , Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Versatile Express updates Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:28:55 +0100 Message-ID: <2782419.lfJiZZjaFg@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.3 (Linux/3.11.0-15-generic; KDE/4.11.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1392138636-29240-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> References: <1392138636-29240-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:6xuYg1P4fKQ6B+Pn4gzvpdhoNIlxxJeT0F765bGn9Rz lXyXtfIlGXyQYzzhnPeadGIIQhfNWAWcPbcu9S3s+6nNzxeVSd oaU55UMeEi450ToUXyvPy3RBXgwcorry9hC798zh+5zLJCDSl2 Hd0BcoAt2qP9nE5u9gA3OBkq0psS8Ol+2KFwIeMO4RjpBKzX39 W0ujt2ldEc5uQwPJ/5G4SxcEjyyzacZvUFMiHikmyToT8bZ7wl niXf2IPmSu2CYYmsSgPYouXOJonqTw9zQ6dbfiLZ0OEEx3BC6V ns6uWHM7KI3QqtCaGZna7rRjbUGqJqSmnm1HMFD6zw4AbP4vb2 2YZJ65fDOGSc1RqEp4Og= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 11 February 2014 17:10:24 Pawel Moll wrote: > This series is a set of updates following the infrastructure > rework and depends on it. It will be finally posted once > the main series is merged. For the time being I would really > appreciate feedback and/or (n)acks... > I haven't read the patches yet, but on a general level, do you think this code can be (or should) be shared with mach-versatile and mach-realview? One of the things on my (mid-term) to-do list is to completely convert those two platforms over to being entirely DT based and having no board specific code so we can actually delete the directories along with mach-vexpress. The sysreg part seems to be almost identical, and I wonder if you have an overview of what the difference is, if any. If we are going to share that code, we might want to give it a different name, as vexpress is just the latest platform in that line. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/