Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 23:52:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 23:52:02 -0500 Received: from pD9E39E8D.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.158.141]:51615 "EHLO localhost") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 23:52:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 05:57:52 +0100 From: Stefan Traby To: Alan Cox Cc: Patrick Finnegan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , zippel@linux-m68k.org Subject: Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) Message-ID: <20021104045752.GB15844@stefan.atko> Reply-To: Stefan Traby References: <1036277779.16971.76.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1036277779.16971.76.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.0-current-20020204i Organization: Stefan Traby Services && Consulting X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.19-stefan (i686) X-APM: 98% -1 min X-PGP: Key fingerprint = C090 8941 DAD8 4B09 77B1 E284 7873 9310 3BDB EA79 X-MIL: A-6172171143 X-Lotto: Suggested Lotto numbers (Austrian 6 out of 45): 6 13 18 23 32 38 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1696 Lines: 43 On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:56:19PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 21:57, Patrick Finnegan wrote: > > On 2 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 20:36, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > > Oh please.... > > > > Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the > > > > qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like > > > > the library? > > > > > > Lota of installations have gtk but don't have qt. > > > > And a lot of installations have QT but not GTK... This feels like a vi vs > > emacs discussion. > > It sort of is. The difference being its "do I send you a vi macro or an > emacs macro", and the obvious answer in this case being that if someone > wants go write both then we all win. It's definitely not. The current solution is simply a denial of service attack, at moment Qt is _required_ for a build, not an optional frontend: [0]--(16:26:00)-(root@stefan)-(/.localvol000/src/kernel/x/linux-2.5.45)-> make oldconfig * * Unable to find the QT installation. Please make sure that the * QT development package is correctly installed and the QTDIR * environment variable is set to the correct location. * make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/.tmp_qtcheck] Fehler 1 make: *** [scripts/kconfig/conf] Fehler 2 [2]--(16:26:05)-(root@stefan)-(/.localvol000/src/kernel/x/linux-2.5.45)-> This should not happen. Anyway, Roman did a good job. -- ciao - Stefan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/