Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753842AbaBLStW (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:49:22 -0500 Received: from mailout3.w2.samsung.com ([211.189.100.13]:50972 "EHLO usmailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753086AbaBLStU (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:49:20 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfec37b-b7f216d000006a8d-f5-52fbc22fac98 Message-id: <52FBC226.8030607@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:49:10 -0700 From: Shuah Khan Reply-to: shuah.kh@samsung.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review References: <20140211184823.492407127@linuxfoundation.org> In-reply-to: <20140211184823.492407127@linuxfoundation.org> Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [105.144.34.3] X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9hX139Q7+DDDZuULGYs34Nm0Xz4vVs Fpd3zWGz+PrTwWLBxkeMFo/63rI7sHnsnHWX3ePEjN8sHvvnrmH3+LxJLoAlissmJTUnsyy1 SN8ugSvjbn9ZwTGuiqbl/YwNjDs4uhg5OSQETCTuHdzHDmGLSVy4t54NxBYSWMYo0bNJrYuR C8juZZLYePMWK4SzgVFi5vl3TCBVvAJaEic3nQbrZhFQlejbtJIRxGYTUJf4/HoHO8QkOYmm JauZQWxRgQiJV2cnskD0Ckr8mHwPzBYRCJZY+3UhI8gCZoEVjBLHX74EO0NYwEyibWkXE8Qg K4lTL/aCxTkFrCUeb21lBbGZgWoetaxjhrDlJTavecsMUa8s8efyKSaI1xQk1l84zDqBUWQW kt2zkLTPQtK+gJF5FaNYaXFyQXFSemqFkV5xYm5xaV66XnJ+7iZGSMxU72C8+9XmEKMAB6MS D6/Fst9BQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4jZqBQrwpiZVVqUX58UWlOanFhxiZODilGhjnxZ8udt64 7UCq7Fq760Kld6cLm/wQSvf7k9C+RiZh0dtHls58W6Zdmqu2K7Qg282PebfOwYhJQY+XXGE8 pzfz0N9rZ7WD0nYLPby3Vzf/C1u1xc7PO/lPXrbim1l6UEL/9BErI6YJSWsveE28K3WssXLK nbr2U+w86358Fl/5aeGcKoHSE8zHlViKMxINtZiLihMBMXTncHcCAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/11/2014 12:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Some -stable releases spring out from my build system bright and shiny > and ready to go. Not so with these releases. Maybe it's the horrid > weather that was happening during the creation of these kernels, or > something else, but whatever it was, they came into this world > screaming, kicking, killing build servers left-and-right, and breaking > the build every other patch. Some developers decided to get into the > act, constantly pushing the boundaries of what is an acceptable -stable > patch, and trying to skirt the rules of upstream patches first numerous > times, making me even grumpier than normal, "forcing" me to relax and > take in an afternoon playing of the Lego movie... > > Test these out well, they have barely survived my systems, and I don't > trust them in the slightest to not eat your disks, reap your tasks, and > run away laughing as your CPU turns into a space heater. > > You have been warned. > > ----------------- > Worked fine on all my test systems. Compile tests and boot tests passed. No dmesg regressions: emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/