Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:01:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:01:20 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:27280 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:01:19 -0500 Subject: Re: [lkcd-general] Re: What's left over. From: Alan Cox To: hps@intermeta.de Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <3DC5DF14.34483A96@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 04 Nov 2002 15:29:35 +0000 Message-Id: <1036423775.1113.71.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 700 Lines: 15 On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 14:45, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > Good! This means, people debugging the code have actually to think and > don't produce "turn on debugger, step here, there, patch a band aid, Some of us debug hardware. Regardless of the nice theories about reviewing your code they don't actually work on hardware because no amount of code review will let you discover things like undocumented 2uS deskew delays, or errors in DMA engines - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/