Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754450AbaBLW6d (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:58:33 -0500 Received: from senator.holtmann.net ([87.106.208.187]:56567 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753724AbaBLW6b convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:58:31 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] rfcomm fixes From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: <52F95A10.5010507@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:58:08 -0800 Cc: "Gustavo F. Padovan" , Johan Hedberg , Gianluca Anzolin , Alexander Holler , Andrey Vihrov , Sander Eikelenboom , "bluez mailin list (linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org)" , linux-kernel Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <433F6D97-A126-4F9F-96AC-4385575E005E@holtmann.org> References: <1391997564-1805-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <3E0F3723-029F-4B12-8D77-9790FDBD3227@holtmann.org> <52F95A10.5010507@hurleysoftware.com> To: Peter Hurley X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Peter, >>> This patch series addresses a number of previously unknown issues >>> with the RFCOMM tty device implementation, in addition to >>> addressing the locking regression recently reported [1]. >>> >>> As Gianluca suggested and I agree, this series first reverts >>> 3 of the 4 patches of 3.14-rc1 for bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c. >> >> so for 3.14 we should revert 3 patches. And then the other 21 are > > intended for 3.15 merge window. > > Yep, this is probably best. At least 3.13 & 3.14 will behave the > same wrt rfcomm. > >> I realize that we still have to deal with some breakage, but we > > do not want regressions and I clearly not going to take 24 patches > > for 3.14 at this point in time. > > Yeah, I wasn't expecting you to. > >> What I can do is take all 24 patches into bluetooth-next and let > > them sit for 1 week and have people test them. And then we go ahead > > with reverting 3 patches from 3.14. Does that make sense? > > Yep, that's fine with me. Thanks. we might also want to add some end-to-end test cases to rfcomm-tester that covers this behavior. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/