Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:12:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:11:54 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.0.238]:5900 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:11:43 -0500 Message-ID: <3A7E90B0.86ED1167@namesys.com> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 14:38:24 +0300 From: Hans Reiser Organization: Namesys X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Gregory Maxwell , Brian Wolfe , Ion Badulescu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Jan Kasprzak Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > > No. There are *many* other compilers out there which are much *more* broken > > then anything RedHat has recently shipped. Unfortunatly, there is no easy > > way to accuratly test for such bugs (because once they can be boiled down to > > a simple test they are very rapidly fixed, what's left is voodoo). > > The problem isn't so much that compilers get bugs and they get fixed as > soon as a good test case pops up, its that end users don't habitually check > for a compiler update. Being able to say 'look go get a new compiler' is > productive. Especially as the kernel can panic with a URL ;) > > Alan Here we agree. Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/