Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751652AbaBMFUY (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:20:24 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:59700 "EHLO mail-oa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750987AbaBMFUW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:20:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140212150627.GB5496@localhost.localdomain> References: <20140212150627.GB5496@localhost.localdomain> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:50:19 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is it ok for deferrable timer wakeup the idle cpu? From: Viresh Kumar To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Lei Wen , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Lists linaro-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12 February 2014 20:36, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > The change I'm applying is strongly inspired from the above. Can I use your Signed-off-by? Sure :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/