Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753620AbaBMJas (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:30:48 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.219.50]:56346 "EHLO mail-oa0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464AbaBMJan (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:30:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:30:42 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FdeEpwgMotHW52cI6nnfnayG72s Message-ID: Subject: ip_set: protocol %u message -- useful? From: Ilia Mirkin To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Patrick McHardy , Vitaly Lavrov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I've recently noticed a lot of [356872.380595] ip_set: protocol 6 messages in my dmesg. This might be because of some local configuration changes I've made, or perhaps a kernel upgrade. Either way, it appears this message has been a pr_notice since the original code added it in a7b4f989a62 ("netfilter: ipset: IP set core support"). Does this message provide a lot of value? Or could it be made into a pr_debug? FWIW commit 1785e8f473 ("netfiler: ipset: Add net namespace for ipset"), merged in v3.13-rc1 changed the code around which may have made it more likely to appear in dmesg (with the namespace stuff). Not sure though. I don't (purposely) use namespaces. I'm happy to put together a patch demoting it to pr_debug if people think it's OK. Thanks, -ilia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/