Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754092AbaBMKPx (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:15:53 -0500 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.4]:57043 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751440AbaBMKPu (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:15:50 -0500 Message-ID: <1392286548.30853.39.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blackfin: bf537: rename "CONFIG_ADT75" From: Paul Bolle To: Jean Delvare Cc: Steven Miao , Michael Hennerich , Jonathan Cameron , Guenter Roeck , adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:15:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20130404134003.016dcee3@endymion.delvare> References: <1365071466.1830.29.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <20130404134003.016dcee3@endymion.delvare> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2014 10:15:48.0863 (UTC) FILETIME=[90F310F0:01CF28A4] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Replaced previous maintainer and list with current maintainer and list.] On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 13:40 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:31:06 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > In v3.2 the Analog Devices ADT75 temperature sensor driver was removed > > as an IIO driver and support for it was added to the LM75 HWMON driver. > > But it was apparently overlooked to rename one reference to CONFIG_ADT75 > > to CONFIG_SENSORS_LM75. Do so now. Use the IS_ENABLED() macro, while > > we're at it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle > > --- > > 0) Also untested. > > > > 1) See commits e96f9d89e6213c7630a3323cd0c754e7f2619564 ("hwmon: (lm75) > > Add support for Analog Devices ADT75") and > > cdea0bec8d37f2943ae500512b0c178bc76de6e3 ("iio: adc: remove ADT75 driver > > - hwmon/lm75 will take over ADT75 support") for the two patches involved > > in this operation. > > > > arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > This breakage is telling us something about the weird approach taken in > this file, methinks. > > > diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c > > index b40b849..9735345 100644 > > --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c > > +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c > > @@ -2221,7 +2221,7 @@ static struct i2c_board_info __initdata bfin_i2c_board_info[] = { > > }, > > #endif > > > > -#if defined(CONFIG_ADT75) || defined(CONFIG_ADT75_MODULE) > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SENSORS_LM75) > > { > > I2C_BOARD_INFO("adt75", 0x9), > > Unrelated to this patch, but this is very odd, as the ADT75 can't have > slave address 0x09. This address is almost exclusively used by battery > chargers AFAIK. > > > .irq = IRQ_PG5, > > The patch itself looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare After which nothing seems to have happened. Can someone please have a look at this patch? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/