Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753690AbaBMLQQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:16:16 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:38012 "EHLO mail-we0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751440AbaBMLQO (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:16:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:16:07 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Jean Delvare Cc: Laszlo Papp , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Convert to be a platform driver Message-ID: <20140213111607.GK32508@lee--X1> References: <1392281438-31836-1-git-send-email-lpapp@kde.org> <20140213095817.GD32508@lee--X1> <20140213111530.2a2b4982@endymion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20140213111530.2a2b4982@endymion.delvare> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:58:17 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > The MFD driver has now been added, so this driver is now being adopted to be a > > > subdevice driver on top of it. This means, the i2c driver usage is being > > > converted to platform driver usage all around. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp > > > --- > > > This patch has been compile tested only and will be tested with real hardware, > > > but early reviews to catch any trivial issues would be welcome. > > > drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 2 +- > > > drivers/hwmon/max6650.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > > > 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > /* > > > * Insmod parameters > > > @@ -105,24 +108,23 @@ module_param(clock, int, S_IRUGO); > > > > > > #define DIV_FROM_REG(reg) (1 << (reg & 7)) > > > > > > -static int max6650_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > > > - const struct i2c_device_id *id); > > > -static int max6650_init_client(struct i2c_client *client); > > > -static int max6650_remove(struct i2c_client *client); > > > +static int max6650_probe(struct platform_device *pdev); > > > +static int max6650_init_client(struct platform_device *pdev); > > > +static int max6650_remove(struct platform_device *pdev); > > > static struct max6650_data *max6650_update_device(struct device *dev); > > > > It would be good to remove these forward declarations in the future. > > > > If no one volunteers I'll happily do it. > > Guenter just did: > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2014-February/041224.html Nice, FWIW: Acked-by: Lee Jones > Any change to the max6650 driver should go on top of his patch series > to avoid conflicts: > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2014-February/041223.html Do you have a tree Laszlo can rebase on top of? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/