Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751695AbaBMVGs (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:06:48 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:36130 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750932AbaBMVGo (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:06:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:06:43 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: David Rientjes Cc: Raghavendra K T , Fengguang Wu , David Cohen , Al Viro , Damien Ramonda , Jan Kara , Linus Torvalds , Nishanth Aravamudan , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anton Blanchard , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V5] mm readahead: Fix readahead fail for no local memory and limit readahead pages Message-Id: <20140213130643.0cf5fb083056cdd159d1aac4@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1390388025-1418-1-git-send-email-raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140206145105.27dec37b16f24e4ac5fd90ce@linux-foundation.org> <20140206152219.45c2039e5092c8ea1c31fd38@linux-foundation.org> <52F4B8A4.70405@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <52F88C16.70204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <52F8C556.6090006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <52FC6F2A.30905@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:05:31 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Raghavendra K T wrote: > > > I was able to test (1) implementation on the system where readahead problem > > occurred. Unfortunately it did not help. > > > > Reason seem to be that CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES dependency of > > numa_mem_id(). The PPC machine I am facing problem has topology like > > this: > > > > numactl -H > > --------- > > available: 2 nodes (0-1) > > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > > ... > > node 0 size: 0 MB > > node 0 free: 0 MB > > node 1 cpus: 8 9 10 11 32 33 34 35 ... > > node 1 size: 8071 MB > > node 1 free: 2479 MB > > node distances: > > node 0 1 > > 0: 10 20 > > 1: 20 10 > > > > So it seems numa_mem_id() does not help for all the configs.. > > Am I missing something ? > > > > You need the patch from http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=139093411119013 > first. That (un-signed-off) powerpc patch appears to be moribund. What's up? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/