Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:08:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:08:23 -0500 Received: from fmr02.intel.com ([192.55.52.25]:41456 "EHLO caduceus.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:07:35 -0500 Message-ID: <012601c28460$3ee6b8b0$7fd40a0a@amr.corp.intel.com> From: "Geoff Gustafson" To: "Jim Freeman" , References: <000a01c28454$56a94b90$7fd40a0a@amr.corp.intel.com> <3DC6FF60.2000100@pobox.com> <20021104163113.B13741@munet-d.enel.ucalgary.ca> <20021104235149.GB4258@lux.homenet> Subject: Re: RFC: A POSIX Linux project? Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:14:02 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 883 Lines: 22 Jim Freeman wrote: > Howzabout the NIST one ? > > http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/ctg/posix_form.htm I think this is based on the 1990 POSIX spec. The things the new suite is starting with have been added since then, up to and including the 2001 spec. It is public domain I believe, so I would like to merge that in at some point, but I would want to review the test cases individually to make sure they still apply to the latest spec, etc. A lot of the work is just checking things in the latest specification and adding/updating references in the code. -- Geoff Gustafson These are my views and not necessarily those of my employer. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/