Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752770AbaBNSsc (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:48:32 -0500 Received: from qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.64]:33497 "EHLO qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752679AbaBNSsa (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:48:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:48:28 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@nuc To: Joonsoo Kim cc: Pekka Enberg , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , Wanpeng Li , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] slab: destroy a slab without holding any alien cache lock In-Reply-To: <1392361043-22420-9-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Message-ID: References: <1392361043-22420-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <1392361043-22420-9-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > I haven't heard that this alien cache lock is contended, but to reduce > chance of contention would be better generally. And with this change, > we can simplify complex lockdep annotation in slab code. > In the following patch, it will be implemented. Ok. Same move as before with the regular freeing. Acked-by: Christoph Lameter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/