Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:16:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:16:46 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:2756 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:16:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15815.14470.953780.411641@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:18:30 +1100 From: Christopher Yeoh To: Dan Kegel Cc: Geoff Gustafson , Linux Kernel Mailing List , sglass@us.ibm.com, cyeoh@au1.ibm.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite In-Reply-To: <3DC70FC3.6030707@ixiacom.com> References: <3DC702E1.1050306@ixiacom.com> <00fd01c2845e$eb407ee0$7fd40a0a@amr.corp.intel.com> <3DC70FC3.6030707@ixiacom.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 933 Lines: 26 At 2002/11/4 16:24-0800 Dan Kegel writes: > > Anyone know what the relationship between the LTP and LSB Posix > compliance tests are? The emphasis on what the test suites are trying to achieve does differ - eg the LSB doesn't have endurance type tests and concentrates more on writing tests which can be used for certification purposes. And of course the LSB test suites only cover the areas that the LSB spec requires. > Were they both originally derived from the OpenGroup Posix compliance tests? I don't think the LTP were tests derived from the OpenGroup (though I'm not that familiar with them). Chris -- cyeoh@au.ibm.com IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group Canberra, Australia - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/