Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:31:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:31:28 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:29715 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:31:26 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Andreas Gruenbacher Organization: SuSE Linux AG To: Chris Wedgwood Subject: Re: What's left over. Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 04:38:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021031030143.401DA2C150@lists.samba.org> <20021031031954.56C772C156@lists.samba.org> <20021031062118.GA18007@tapu.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <20021031062118.GA18007@tapu.f00f.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200211050438.01179.agruen@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 726 Lines: 17 On Thursday 31 October 2002 07:21, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > Don't get me wrong, I'm not against sane ACLs (POSIX ACLs are not) or > EAs [...] POSIX ACLs are more complicated than what would be inherently necessary, if we were in a situation where we could design from scratch. Unfortunately we are not in that situation. I've heard dozens of people complain about POSIX ACLs (and other kinds as well); nobody was able to come up with something truly better so far. --Andreas. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/