Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:22:22 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Roger <rogerable@realtek.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>, Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>, Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
        wei_wang@realsil.com.cn, micky_ching@realsil.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add realtek USB card reader driver
Message-ID: <20140217082222.GA17875@lee--X1>
References: <1392199238-14500-1-git-send-email-rogerable@realtek.com>
 <1392199238-14500-2-git-send-email-rogerable@realtek.com>
 <20140214094427.GA7380@lee--X1>
 <5301A786.8040607@realtek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <5301A786.8040607@realtek.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

> >>From: Roger Tseng <rogerable@realtek.com>
> >>
> >>Realtek USB card reader provides a channel to transfer command or data to flash
> >>memory cards. This driver exports host instances for mmc and memstick subsystems
> >>and handles basic works.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Roger Tseng <rogerable@realtek.com>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  10 +
> >>  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |   1 +
> >>  drivers/mfd/rtsx_usb.c       | 760 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  include/linux/mfd/rtsx_usb.h | 628 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  4 files changed, 1399 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rtsx_usb.c
> >>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rtsx_usb.h
> >
> >Applied again, thanks.
> >
> Would you also apply patch 2/3 and 3/3 that to make the device fully
> operational for users? Or should they be applied by maintainers of
> mmc/memstick subsystems?
> 
> Chris, would you give some comment?

I can apply them, but I need the other Maintainer Acks.

If they are build orthogonal i.e. there are no build dependencies
between them, it's probably better that they go into their associated
trees separately.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/