Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752822AbaBQJK4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:10:56 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.219.48]:64881 "EHLO mail-oa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752710AbaBQJK1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:10:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5301CE86.9020105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <15ccc0609cb9ee3db0ad3a95b29bf69d11ea197c.1392375504.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <4772234.6D4cUIJHX4@vostro.rjw.lan> <5301C605.3030205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5301CE86.9020105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:26 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Return error if ->get() failed in cpufreq_update_policy() From: Viresh Kumar To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lists linaro-kernel , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Pierre Ossman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 17 February 2014 14:25, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > Specifically, I'm referring to the problem where there _is_ a difference, > but the ->get() is not reporting it properly, like returning a 0 for example. I think get() returning zero isn't acceptable at all. How can current freq be zero :) .. There has to be a bug somewhere and so we shouldn't really try to get working here.. That's what I thought. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/