Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 01:09:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 01:09:45 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:19728 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 01:09:44 -0500 Subject: Re: ps performance sucks (was Re: dcache_rcu [performance results]) From: Robert Love To: Alexander Viro Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , andersen@codepoet.org, Werner Almesberger , jw schultz , LKML In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 05 Nov 2002 01:15:49 -0500 Message-Id: <1036476957.777.10.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 715 Lines: 20 On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:59, Alexander Viro wrote: > Oh, yes it can. Easily. > * device is not network-transparent - even in principle > * restricting data access would be harder - welcome to suid or > sgid country > * real killer: you think Albert would fail to produce equally > crappy code and equally crappy behaviour? Yeah, right. Well I think Rik and I can handle it in our tree :) But I agree - I do not care much for this /dev idea either. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/