Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753185AbaBQNDV (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:03:21 -0500 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews10.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.15]:55342 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews10.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752059AbaBQNDU (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:03:20 -0500 Message-ID: <1392642197.13000.20.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: remove XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST From: Paul Bolle To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Richard Weinberger , Michael Opdenacker , Ingo Molnar , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , David Vrabel , Boris Ostrovsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:03:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201402171223.s1HCNG0S023567@userz7022.oracle.com> References: <201402171223.s1HCNG0S023567@userz7022.oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Feb 2014 13:03:18.0306 (UTC) FILETIME=[A0896020:01CF2BE0] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 07:23 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Feb 16, 2014 3:07 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > Please look in the grub git tree. They have fixed their code to not do > this anymore. This should be reflected in the patch description. Thanks, I didn't know that. That turned out to be grub commit ec824e0f2a399ce2ab3a2e3353d372a236595059 ("Implement grub_file tool and use it to implement generating of config"), see http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/util/grub.d/20_linux_xen.in?id=ec824e0f2a399ce2ab3a2e3353d372a236595059 > Lastly please check which distro has this new grub version so that we > know which distros won't be affected. No distro should be affected. See, the test that grub2 used to do was (edited for clarity): grep -qx "CONFIG_XEN_DOM0=y" "${config}" || grep -qx "CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST=y" "${config}" But the Kconfig entry for XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST reads: config XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST def_bool XEN_DOM0 Ie, XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST is equal to XEN_DOM0 by definition, so the second part of that test is superfluous. (We discussed this last year. If lkml.org weren't down I'd provide a link.) Or am I misreading this Kconfig entry? I hope to send a v2, with an updated commit explanation, in a few days. Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/