Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:37:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:37:54 -0500 Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com ([204.127.202.61]:1684 "EHLO sccrmhc01.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:37:53 -0500 Message-ID: <3DC784E3.2090001@namesys.com> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 00:44:19 -0800 From: reiser Reply-To: reiser@namesys.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Zarochentcev CC: Nikita Danilov , Tomas Szepe , lkml , Oleg Drokin , umka Subject: Re: [BK][PATCH] Reiser4, will double Linux FS performance, pleaseapply References: <3DC19F61.5040007@namesys.com> <200210312334.18146.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <3DC1B2FA.8010809@namesys.com> <3DC1D63A.CCAD78EF@digeo.com> <3DC1D885.6030902@namesys.com> <3DC1D9D0.684326AC@digeo.com> <3DC1DF02.7060307@namesys.com> <20021101102327.GA26306@louise.pinerecords.com> <15810.46998.714820.519167@crimson.namesys.com> <20021102132421.GJ28803@louise.pinerecords.com> <15814.21309.758207.21416@laputa.namesys.com> <3DC773B0.4070701@namesys.com> <15815.33089.583184.62816@crimson.namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <3DC19F61.5040007@namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1213 Lines: 30 Alexander Zarochentcev wrote: > > > > > >In reiser4 allocation of disk space is delayed to transaction commit. It > > >is not possible to estimate precisely amount of disk space that will be > > >allocated during commit, and hence statfs(2) results are not updated > > >until one does sync(2) (forcing commit) or transaction is committed due > > >to age (10 minutes by default). > > > > > > > > > > > The above is badly phrased, and the behavior complained of is indeed a > > bug not a feature. Please fix. > > > > statfs should be updated immediately in accordance with estimates used > > by the space reservation code, and then adjusted at commit time in > > accordance with actual usage. > >We should not do that unless we implement forcing of commits at out of free >space situation. > I thought we had agreed to do forcing of commits at out of free space quite some time ago? In any event, we should do forcing of commits at out of free space. Yes? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/