Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:47:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:47:22 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:10258 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:47:21 -0500 From: Alexander Zarochentcev MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15815.34316.24237.515178@crimson.namesys.com> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:49:16 +0300 To: reiser@namesys.com Cc: Nikita Danilov , Tomas Szepe , lkml , Oleg Drokin , umka Subject: Re: [BK][PATCH] Reiser4, will double Linux FS performance, pleaseapply In-Reply-To: <3DC784E3.2090001@namesys.com> References: <3DC19F61.5040007@namesys.com> <200210312334.18146.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <3DC1B2FA.8010809@namesys.com> <3DC1D63A.CCAD78EF@digeo.com> <3DC1D885.6030902@namesys.com> <3DC1D9D0.684326AC@digeo.com> <3DC1DF02.7060307@namesys.com> <20021101102327.GA26306@louise.pinerecords.com> <15810.46998.714820.519167@crimson.namesys.com> <20021102132421.GJ28803@louise.pinerecords.com> <15814.21309.758207.21416@laputa.namesys.com> <3DC773B0.4070701@namesys.com> <15815.33089.583184.62816@crimson.namesys.com> <3DC784E3.2090001@namesys.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under Emacs 21.2.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1449 Lines: 37 reiser writes: > Alexander Zarochentcev wrote: > > > > > > > > >In reiser4 allocation of disk space is delayed to transaction commit. It > > > >is not possible to estimate precisely amount of disk space that will be > > > >allocated during commit, and hence statfs(2) results are not updated > > > >until one does sync(2) (forcing commit) or transaction is committed due > > > >to age (10 minutes by default). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The above is badly phrased, and the behavior complained of is indeed a > > > bug not a feature. Please fix. > > > > > > statfs should be updated immediately in accordance with estimates used > > > by the space reservation code, and then adjusted at commit time in > > > accordance with actual usage. > > > >We should not do that unless we implement forcing of commits at out of free > >space situation. > > > I thought we had agreed to do forcing of commits at out of free space > quite some time ago? In any event, we should do forcing of commits at > out of free space. Yes? we will control this by a block allocator flag, we set it when we can close current transaction. I think for most cases it will be set. -- Alex. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/