Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751959AbaBQVAZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:00:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:39549 "EHLO mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750939AbaBQVAX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:00:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:00:22 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wQDzTbwFslDsWZROzi-76hlU154 Message-ID: Subject: New bcache compiler warning (was: Re: bcache: Minor fixes from kbuild robot) From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Kent Overstreet Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > bcache: Minor fixes from kbuild robot > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c b/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c > index 4f6b594..3f74b4b 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ void bch_dump_bset(struct btree_keys *b, struct bset *i, unsigned set) > for (k = i->start; k < bset_bkey_last(i); k = next) { > next = bkey_next(k); > > - printk(KERN_ERR "block %u key %zi/%u: ", set, > + printk(KERN_ERR "block %u key %li/%u: ", set, > (uint64_t *) k - i->d, i->keys); > > if (b->ops->key_dump) On 32-bit (m68k): drivers/md/bcache/bset.c: In function ‘bch_dump_bset’: drivers/md/bcache/bset.c:27: warning: format ‘%li’ expects type ‘long int’, but argument 3 has type ‘int’ What are you trying to print here? It looks a bit strange to me. Technically, the difference between two pointers is of type ptrdiff_. The kernel had typedef __kernel_ptrdiff_t ptrdiff_t; and #if __BITS_PER_LONG != 64 typedef unsigned int __kernel_size_t; typedef int __kernel_ssize_t; typedef int __kernel_ptrdiff_t; #else typedef __kernel_ulong_t __kernel_size_t; typedef __kernel_long_t __kernel_ssize_t; typedef __kernel_long_t __kernel_ptrdiff_t; #endif So I'd expect "%zi" to be the right way, and a quick test compile on 32-bit (m68k) and 64-bit (amd64) comfirms that. What was wrong with it? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/