Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:41:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:41:21 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:16277 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:41:21 -0500 Subject: Re: naive but spectacular ext3 HTREE+Orlov benchmark From: Alan Cox To: bert hubert Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , tytso@mit.edu In-Reply-To: <20021105151702.GA5894@outpost.ds9a.nl> References: <20021105151702.GA5894@outpost.ds9a.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 05 Nov 2002 16:10:04 +0000 Message-Id: <1036512604.4827.93.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 726 Lines: 14 On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 15:17, bert hubert wrote: > Congratulations everybody, this is a major result! You can in fact *hear* > the difference. With the Orlov allocator, seeks are much more higher pitched > as if they are generally over shorter distances - which they probably are. How does the Orlov allocator do if you continually randomly use and reuse the file space for a long period of time - the current allocator is pretty stable, does Orlov behave the same or degenerate ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/