Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752456AbaBSATy (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:19:54 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:64554 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752234AbaBSATq (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:19:46 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Dirk Brandewie Cc: dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] intel_pstate updates for v3.14-rcX Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:34:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4187014.8zm183CESa@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.13.0+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5303F28C.4060906@intel.com> References: <1392228067-14817-1-git-send-email-dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> <2705558.gK5sRhMz43@vostro.rjw.lan> <5303F28C.4060906@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 03:53:48 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: > On 02/18/2014 02:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:29:54 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: > >> Hi Rafael, > > > > Hi, > > > >> On 02/12/2014 10:01 AM, dirk.brandewie@gmail.com wrote: > >>> From: Dirk Brandewie > >>> > >>> Based on v3.14-rc2 > >>> > >>> Patch 1 removes energy reporting the patch from Maurizio Lambardi > >>> intel_pstate: fix race condition in intel_pstate_init() can be dropped. > >>> > >> > >> Any reason why patches 2-5 did not make rc3 other than timing? > >> > >> Patches 2/3 can easily wait for v3.15.x > >> > >> Patches 4/5 fix bugs that are in the wild. > > > > I asked you about them, but you didn't reply: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=139225158531023&w=4 > > > > Again, do patches [4-5/5] depend on [2-3/5]? > > > > If not, I can queue them up for -rc4. > > All the patches are independent of one another. > > Patch 2 is straight cleanup no functional change but reduces the memory > footprint slightly. > > Patch 3 is a bug that will only be seen when the PID is reset at init time > or when a change is made to PID params via debugfs. The problem will only > exist for one sample time since it is setting last_err in the PID. > > Patch 4-5 are bugs found during Baytrail-T testing Are there any pointers to bug reports that may be included in the changelogs of these? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/