Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752178AbaBSA24 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:28:56 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:59950 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751945AbaBSA2y (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:28:54 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Dirk Brandewie Cc: "dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] intel_pstate updates for v3.14-rcX Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:43:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1862084.mmnlZ4yS6m@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.13.0+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1392228067-14817-1-git-send-email-dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> <4187014.8zm183CESa@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 04:24:02 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 03:53:48 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: > > > On 02/18/2014 02:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:29:54 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: > > > >> Hi Rafael, > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > >> On 02/12/2014 10:01 AM, dirk.brandewie@gmail.com wrote: > > > >>> From: Dirk Brandewie > > > > >>> > > > >>> Based on v3.14-rc2 > > > >>> > > > >>> Patch 1 removes energy reporting the patch from Maurizio Lambardi > > > >>> intel_pstate: fix race condition in intel_pstate_init() can be > > dropped. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> Any reason why patches 2-5 did not make rc3 other than timing? > > > >> > > > >> Patches 2/3 can easily wait for v3.15.x > > > >> > > > >> Patches 4/5 fix bugs that are in the wild. > > > > > > > > I asked you about them, but you didn't reply: > > > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=139225158531023&w=4 > > > > > > > > Again, do patches [4-5/5] depend on [2-3/5]? > > > > > > > > If not, I can queue them up for -rc4. > > > > > > All the patches are independent of one another. > > > > > > Patch 2 is straight cleanup no functional change but reduces the memory > > > footprint slightly. > > > > > > Patch 3 is a bug that will only be seen when the PID is reset at init > > time > > > or when a change is made to PID params via debugfs. The problem will > > only > > > exist for one sample time since it is setting last_err in the PID. > > > > > > Patch 4-5 are bugs found during Baytrail-T testing > > > > Are there any pointers to bug reports that may be included in the > > changelogs > > of these? > > > No. I got the reports via email. I could probably get the reporters to > file bugzillas. It would be good to add information about what machines are affected and what the user-visible problems are to the changelogs for future reference. And do we want these two patches in -stable? If so, what -stable series should they go into? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/